8:55 Welcome and Introductions
9:00 The Nuts and Bolts of Appellate Litigation in North Carolina Courts‡
Judge Allegra Collins, North Carolina Court of Appeals, Raleigh
Judge Richard D. Dietz, North Carolina Court of Appeals, Raleigh
Judge Fred Gore, North Carolina Court of Appeals, Raleigh
The past year has been a year of change for appellate practice in the North Carolina courts and there are more exciting changes to come. In this session, three Court of Appeals judges bring you up to speed on the recent and upcoming changes in practice, procedure, and technology at the appellate courts. They describe how to use technology to improve the quality of written and oral presentations, discuss the future of remote oral arguments, explore the shift to e-filing in the trial courts and its ramifications for appellate practice, explain North Carolina's new universal citation system, and preview some appellate rule changes that are likely to arrive soon.
10:03 Hidden Gems: The Surprising Stories Behind Some of North Carolina's Appellate Practices
Matthew N. Leerberg, Fox Rothschild LLP, Raleigh
Elizabeth Brooks Scherer, Fox Rothschild LLP, Raleigh
Over a span of several years, Matt Leerberg and Beth Scherer researched and wrote a comprehensive treatise on North Carolina appellate practice and procedure. As they did so, they discovered that many modern appellate practices have a fascinating historical pedigree. Why are so many mistakes at the notice-of-appeal stage considered "jurisdictional"? Why are orders entered after a final judgment appealable at all? How did the Appellate Rules come to take their current form? Join us as we explore these and many other questions through the lens of history.
11:04 Break
11:14 Strategies and Resources for Addressing the Risks of Remote Work for Mental Health and Professionalism†
Judge Lucy N. Inman, North Carolina Court of Appeals, Raleigh
Robert E. Harrington, Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson PA, Charlotte
Richard E. Hicks Ph.D., HRC Behavioral Health & Psychiatry PA, Chapel Hill
The shift to a remote working environment over the past year has serious implications for lawyers' mental health and standards of professionalism. Remote work and accompanying strains on mental health can enhance feelings of isolation, heighten the risk of depression and substance abuse, and lead to unprofessional behavior as lawyers in their communication and work product. Appellate lawyers can be especially prone to these risks given the sometimes-isolating nature of appellate work. In this session, presenters draw on their experience to discuss these issues, advise attorneys on how to recognize situations in which they or their colleagues might benefit from intervention, and make lawyers aware of strategies and resources that are available to help them get back on track.
12:15 Lunch Break
12:45 From the Private Bar to the Federal Bench: What I Know Now That I Wish I Knew Then
Judge Allison J. Rushing, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Asheville
Sripriya Narasimhan, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh
In March 2019, after spending nearly a decade practicing appellate litigation, the Honorable Allison Jones Rushing moved from the private bar to the federal bench. Despite many years at the height of the practice, the transition to the bench has brought a host of insights that Judge Rushing wishes she had known when she was writing briefs and crafting oral arguments to convince her now-judicial colleagues. In this session, Sripriya Narasimhan interviews Judge Rushing about those insights and other lessons learned over the last two years.
1:17 Issue Framing
Mark A. Hiller, Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson PA, Raleigh
Timothy P. Lendino, Compass Group North America, Charlotte
How do you turn a dry legal argument into a compelling story that grabs the judge's attention? What does it mean for your argument to have a "theme"? This session focuses on the elusive yet critical skill of issue framing, offering practical guidance. While often referred to in the context of appellate brief writing, issue framing can strengthen your written and oral advocacy in any court, and even outside the courtroom.
2:19 Break
2:29 Cross-Appeals: What, Why, When and How in State and Federal Courts
James W. Doggett, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh
Michelle A. Liguori, Ellis & Winters LLP, Raleigh
Cross-appeals are not everyday affairs in appellate litigation, but when necessary, they can be vital to protecting your clients' interests. In this session, Jim Doggett and Michelle Liguori draw on their significant experience to explain what a cross-appeal is, why you may want or need to file a cross-appeal, and the procedures to be followed for briefing and arguing cross‑appeals under both the North Carolina and federal rules. The state-law portion includes a discussion of cross-appeals in the North Carolina Supreme Court, including dissent-based appeals and cases heard on discretionary review. The presenters also survey data about recent cross-appeals in the North Carolina appellate courts and the Fourth Circuit and discuss a few landmark cross-appeals that highlight the governing rules and pitfalls to avoid.
3:29 The Lighting of a Fire: Lessons Learned in Supervising Appellate Clinic Students
Sean E. Andrussier, Duke University School of Law, Durham
John J. Korzen, Wake Forest University School of Law, Winston-Salem
It has been said that "education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." In this session, the presenters discuss lessons learned from supervising 3Ls in the appellate clinics they have directed for more than 25 combined years. With advice appropriate for young appellate attorneys, those who supervise young appellate attorneys and everybody in between, they share thoughts on the "lighting of a fire" in appellate counsel.
4:00 Adjourn
† Indicates portion providing Substance Abuse/Mental Health credit
‡ Indicates portion providing Technology Training credit